UK open to paying into EU funds for electricity market access
Britain is ready to negotiate financial contributions to the European Union's cohesion fund in exchange for joining the continent's integrated power grid.
By Hassan Ellis ·

The United Kingdom is prepared to discuss making payments toward infrastructure projects in less affluent European Union regions in return for gaining access to the European electricity market. Hamish Falconer, the cabinet minister responsible for renegotiating the bilateral relationship, confirmed that the two sides are likely to address this issue following the upcoming summit. Ministers are currently focused on deepening ties with the union over the coming years.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has previously stated his desire for a significantly closer relationship with the EU, even suggesting the possibility of the UK rejoining as a full member. While senior officials in Brussels have expressed enthusiasm for discussing such a move, they have indicated they want to see the UK begin paying for access to European schemes it claims to want. This week, five European leaders welcomed the UK's interest in joining the European electricity market but noted that Britain would need to contribute to a specific cohesion fund to proceed.
Although UK officials maintain that they do not formally accept the link between electricity reforms and the cohesion fund, Falconer admitted that the government would enter talks regarding additional contributions. He clarified that the principle has not been accepted yet, but acknowledged that the EU has requested it and the matter will be a topic of discussion.
Falconer expressed hope that the highly anticipated EU-UK summit next week will make significant progress in reversing some of the damage caused by Brexit. Negotiators aim to sign agreements on food and drink standards, carbon emissions, and youth mobility. However, integrating Britain into the EU electricity market is expected to be controversial. The cohesion fund supports economic development in poorer bloc regions, and UK officials are cautious about using British taxpayer money for infrastructure projects in central and eastern Europe.
Beyond energy, Falconer emphasized the UK's interest in joining a future EU defence fund. Last year, talks on Britain's entry into the EU's 150 billion euro defence fund collapsed due to a dispute over the UK's financial contribution. The UK had sought to join the first round of the Security Action for Europe fund, a low-interest loan scheme designed to increase defence spending by 800 billion euros. EU officials proposed an entry fee of up to 6 billion euros, which was significantly higher than the administrative fee the government expected, leading to the breakdown of negotiations.
Falconer described the failure of the previous deal as a shame, noting that the terms were not agreeable for the UK. He expressed optimism about a future version of the scheme where Britain could participate on reasonable terms. He also hopes negotiators will finalize a youth mobility scheme before the summit on November 20. A major sticking point remains the demand for home tuition fees for EU students at UK universities.
Reports last week indicated that the UK was prepared to spend up to 450 million pounds annually to offer discounted tuition fees to EU students if Brussels granted access to the Made in Europe industrial programme. Falconer acknowledged the interest from member states in lowering fees for EU students but noted that this requires arrangements different from those initially envisioned.
The minister was positive about the UK's return to the Erasmus+ student exchange scheme next year. The UK left this program under the 2020 Brexit deal. The new arrangement will include schools and colleges, not just universities. Falconer rejected criticisms from Nigel Farage, who argued the scheme opens the door to uncontrolled immigration. He described the program as beneficial for young people and suggested that Farage should reconsider his stance.





